Direct dating of gold by radiogenic helium

06-Aug-2017 16:36

direct dating of gold by radiogenic helium-53

Free text sexchat german

Humphreys cannot make any claim regarding my inappropriate use of a multi-domain diffusion model, because I have replicated the results of my original old-earth model with a simpler single-domain diffusion model. Although such modeling does not prove such a mechanism for these non-Arrhenius effects, it suggests that only a small proportion of gas resides in domains that exhibit anomalously high diffusivity, and therefore this phenomenon may not significantly affect the bulk closure temperature or He diffusion properties of most natural zircons.

This model relies on the high-temperature steps of a diffusion experiment, and therefore makes no claims about the retention of loosely bound helium. If that is indeed the quote that Humphreys is referring to, then I would argue that he is the one who is misquoting Reiners.

The background concentration is not well constrained by the data, but a sensitivity analysis shows that the results do not significantly change over that range, and that all observables can be matched by the model.

I can put together a more formal presentation if you wish. Originally posted by Poster 5 Oh that is fine thanks, no need for too much more detail!

There is nothing in his statement or experiment to preclude the possibility of helium remaining after the initial ramp.

It was just a topic that was outside of the scope of this particular study.

The bottom line is that good agreement to the measured helium retention of Gentry is obtained for both experimental sources for the diffusion parameters, provided that the high-temperature data is used to extract the single-domain diffusion model.

If one insists that the low-temperature data be included, as Humphreys did, then a multi-domain diffusion model must be used instead.

direct dating of gold by radiogenic helium-42

iceprincess dating

(Humphreys, 2008) Regardless of whether one considers this statement by Humphreys to be right or wrong, this latest result renders it completely irrelevant. Which part of which quote does he think you overlooked and what is he talking about and what is your response to his criticism? Originally Posted by Reiners Zircons with a wide range of ages and radiation dosages exhibited approximately the same degree of non-Arrhenius behavior in initial diffusion steps.Second, the statement about the loose helium being gone after the initial ramp are not in the quote by Reiners!

Another important point I need to make about location.… continue reading »

Read more

It is simple, we will pick a random peer for you to talk to somewhere in the world. You never know you may find someone like you in our private chat rooms.… continue reading »

Read more

He does not have to hold your job for you until you are able to return to work.… continue reading »

Read more

As Business Insider previously reported, 80% of Tinder users say they're looking for a meaningful relationship — despite the app's reputation as a place to find hookups.… continue reading »

Read more

Julian dates range from 1 to 365 days, and since most companies pack their eggs shortly after they're laid, it's a good indicator.… continue reading »

Read more